From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richter v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co.

Supreme Court of California
Mar 13, 1894
101 Cal. 582 (Cal. 1894)

Opinion

         Department Two

         Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial.

         COUNSEL:

         T. P. Ryan, for Appellant.

          District Attorney Firman Church, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Fitzgerald, J. McFarland, J., and De Haven, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          FITZGERALD, Judge

         Action to abate an alleged public nuisance. Plaintiff had judgment, and the Fresno Mining Company, intervenor, appeals from the judgment and the order denying its motion for a new trial.

         It appears that certain material findings in this case are attacked by the specifications on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support them.

         But as the respondent herein has not seen fit to file a brief, or to argue the case orally, we do not feel called upon to perform the duty of counsel by hunting through the record for the purpose of discovering evidence to support the findings, which it was his duty, if it existed, to point out to the court.

         Under such circumstances this court will assume, without looking into the record, that the point urged by appellant that the evidence is insufficient to justify the findings attacked, is well taken.

         Judgment and order reversed.


Summaries of

Richter v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co.

Supreme Court of California
Mar 13, 1894
101 Cal. 582 (Cal. 1894)
Case details for

Richter v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co.

Case Details

Full title:J. A. RICHTER, Roadmaster, etc., Respondent, v. THE FRESNO CANAL AND…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Mar 13, 1894

Citations

101 Cal. 582 (Cal. 1894)
36 P. 96

Citing Cases

State Farm Fire v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

(Cf. Richter v. Fresno Canal etc. Co. (1894) 101 Cal. 582 [36 P. 96]; Roth v. Keene (1967) 256 Cal.App.2d 725…

Lutz v. Merchants Nat. Bank

The matter is now submitted for decision upon the brief of the appellant and the typewritten transcript,…