From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richmond v. Richmond

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 26, 1909
89 N.E. 1111 (N.Y. 1909)

Opinion

Argued October 12, 1909

Decided October 26, 1909

Helen Z.M. Rodgers, William L. Marcy and Adelbert Moot for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.

Louis L. Babcock for defendants, respondents and appellants.


Judgment affirmed, without costs to either party, on opinion of SPRING, J., below.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ.


Summaries of

Richmond v. Richmond

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 26, 1909
89 N.E. 1111 (N.Y. 1909)
Case details for

Richmond v. Richmond

Case Details

Full title:LORAINE RICHMOND, Appellant and Respondent, v . JOHN R.H. RICHMOND et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 26, 1909

Citations

89 N.E. 1111 (N.Y. 1909)
89 N.E. 1111

Citing Cases

United States Trust Co. v. Heye

The learned referee, erroneously as we think, allotted these rights to the life beneficiaries. It has been…

Pratt v. Ladd

" In Richmond v. Richmond ( 123 App. Div. 117; affd., 196 N.Y. 535) the court said: "Accumulations often go…