From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richmond v. A.P. Green Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of California
Dec 23, 1997
71 Cal. Rptr. 2d 214 (Cal. 1997)

Opinion


Page __

__ Cal.4th __ 71 Cal.Rptr.2d 214, 950 P.2d 58 Kyle RICHMOND, Respondent, v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al., Appellants. No. S062813. Supreme Court of California Dec. 23, 1997

         Prior report: Cal.App., l64 Cal.Rptr.2d 199.

         The above-entitled review is hereby transferred to the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Five, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438, 941 P.2d 71.

         [71 Cal.Rptr.2d 215] [ 950 P.2d 59] GEORGE, C.J., and MOSK, BASTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN and BROWN, JJ., concur.

         KENNARD, J., is of the opinion the review should not be transferred.


Summaries of

Richmond v. A.P. Green Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of California
Dec 23, 1997
71 Cal. Rptr. 2d 214 (Cal. 1997)
Case details for

Richmond v. A.P. Green Industries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Kyle RICHMOND, Respondent, v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Dec 23, 1997

Citations

71 Cal. Rptr. 2d 214 (Cal. 1997)
950 P.2d 58

Citing Cases

Owens Corning v. Bauman

Citing principally the asserted uncertainty Owens Corning believes results from the Grimshaw construction of…