From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Hobgood

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1915
86 S.E. 709 (N.C. 1915)

Opinion

(Filed 3 November, 1915.)

Appeal and Error — Fragmentary Appeals — Final Judgment.

An appeal is premature and will not lie from an order that the sheriff hold the proceeds of sale of a horse and buggy seized under the "Search and Seizure" act of 1915, to await final judgment, the case appearing to be heard upon a case agreed to test the validity of the act.

APPEAL by plaintiff from Allen, J., at the July Term, 1915, of (38) GRANVILLE.

T. Lanier for the plaintiff.

No counsel for the defendant.


This matter seems to have been heard upon facts agreed, and from the judgment rendered the plaintiff appealed. The purpose of the action seems to be recover from the defendant, sheriff of Granville County, a horse and buggy and other property of the plaintiff seized by the sheriff for violation of the liquor laws of the State under the "Search and Seizure" act of 1915, which authorizes the seizure of vehicles as well as liquor.

The purpose of the plaintiff evidently is to contest the validity of such law, but we think the appeal is premature, as no final judgment has been rendered in the action. The only order made at July Term, 1915, adjudges that the defendant hold the property or the proceeds of the sale thereof to await final judgment in this action.

In the record is a written agreement, signed by the counsel for the plaintiff, that the defendant sheriff may sell the horse and buggy seized by him, and hold the proceeds to await final judgment in this action. The record sent up to this Court contains no final judgment, and none seems to have been rendered. The appeal is, therefore, premature, and is

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Richardson v. Hobgood

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1915
86 S.E. 709 (N.C. 1915)
Case details for

Richardson v. Hobgood

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT RICHARDSON v. S.C. HOBGOOD, SHERIFF

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1915

Citations

86 S.E. 709 (N.C. 1915)
170 N.C. 37

Citing Cases

Summers v. R. R

New trial. Cited: Stone v. R. R., 144 N.C. 229, 232; Cardwell v. R. R., 146 N.C. 220; Rollins v. R. R., ib.,…

Rollins v. R. R

No error. Cited: Cardwell v. R. R., post, 220; Robertson v. R. R., 148 N.C. 324; McRackan v. R. R., 150 N.C.…