Opinion
January 25, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.).
Cognizant as we are of the difficulties encountered by IAS courts in supervising the preparation of the cases assigned to them for trial and understanding the court's reluctance to reward movant's inaction in enforcing its right to an additional physical examination of the plaintiff and to inspect and test a sample of the nightshirt in question, we find no improvident exercise of discretion in its ruling. Nevertheless, since there is some question regarding responsibility for the inaction and apparent scheduling difficulties, we afford the movant one final 45-day period during which to complete discovery. The case shall remain on the Trial Calendar during this period (see, 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]; Ronel-Bennett, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co., 149 A.D.2d 678).
Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Sullivan, Milonas, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.