From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rich v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

May, 1936.


In a negligence action, order substituting attorneys and allowing the former attorney a percentage of any recovery which may be had by settlement or judgment modified so as to allow the attorney the sum of $100 for his compensation and three dollars for disbursements made by him, and as so modified affirmed, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, without costs. In our opinion, it was error for the Special Term to fix the appellant's compensation by a percentage upon any recovery which may be had. The appellant is entitled to the fair value of the services performed by him thus far. ( Matter of Krooks, 257 N.Y. 329.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rich v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Rich v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SYLVIA RICH and HARRY RICH, Respondents, v. RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Podbielski v. Conrad

The lien of the discharged attorney may not be fixed on a percentage basis over objection. ( Martucci v.…