151
Decided April 30, 2002.
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that denied appellant's cross motion to amend the complaint, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Full title:ADAM Z. RICE, C., Appellant, v. PENGUIN PUTNAM, INC., Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 30, 2002
section 349 reveals any intent by the legislature to bar consumers from recovering money spent as a result of…
Himmelstein v. Matthew Bender & Co.In addition, plaintiffs identified no contractual provisions that required defendant to update the 2016…