From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhodes v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Jun 16, 2011
No. 1:11-cv-00483-GBW-LAM (D.N.M. Jun. 16, 2011)

Opinion

No. 1:11-cv-00483-GBW-LAM.

June 16, 2011


STIPULATED ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PARTY


THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon the parties' Stipulated Motion for Substitution of Party (Doc. 5) and the Court being fully advised in the matter, finds that good cause exists and the motion shall be granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Good Samaritan Society, Inc. be dismissed from this action without prejudice and that The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society d/b/a Good Samaritan Society — Las Cruces Village be substituted as the proper defendant. It appears that counsel currently of record for Good Samaritan Society, Inc. will continue in this action as counsel for The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society d/b/a Good Samaritan Society — Las Cruces Village and that Plaintiff does not need to serve The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society d/b/a Good Samaritan Society — Las Cruces Village because counsel have already filed an answer on behalf of that entity ( see [ Doc. 6]).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rhodes v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Jun 16, 2011
No. 1:11-cv-00483-GBW-LAM (D.N.M. Jun. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Rhodes v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society

Case Details

Full title:MARSHA RHODES, individually and as Personal Representative for the Estate…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: Jun 16, 2011

Citations

No. 1:11-cv-00483-GBW-LAM (D.N.M. Jun. 16, 2011)

Citing Cases

Stone v. New Schiller B. L. Assn

Paul G. Collins, with him Robert Ruane, C. B. Comegys, Walter W. Harris, J. Julius Levy, Rudolph Houck,…

Phillips et Ux. v. Tetzner

This is without merit. While it is a sound legal principle that unless an option is exercised within the time…