From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhoades v. California

Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 2, 2020
141 S. Ct. 659 (2020)

Summary

advancing to second step upon timely objection "would serve the important goals of promoting transparency, creating a record for appellate review, and ensuring public confidence in our justice system, while imposing ‘the comparatively low cost of requiring a party to state its actual reasons for striking a minority prospective juror’ "

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Carter

Opinion

No. 19-8332.

11-02-2020

Robert Boyd RHOADES, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.


Summaries of

Rhoades v. California

Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 2, 2020
141 S. Ct. 659 (2020)

advancing to second step upon timely objection "would serve the important goals of promoting transparency, creating a record for appellate review, and ensuring public confidence in our justice system, while imposing ‘the comparatively low cost of requiring a party to state its actual reasons for striking a minority prospective juror’ "

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Carter
Case details for

Rhoades v. California

Case Details

Full title:Robert Boyd RHOADES, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States.

Date published: Nov 2, 2020

Citations

141 S. Ct. 659 (2020)
208 L. Ed. 2d 270

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Carter

See Sanchez, 485 Mass. at 515-516, 151 N.E.3d 404 (Lowy, J., concurring) (cataloging cases where ending…