From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. Dall. Cnty. Jail Psych Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 20, 2016
No. 3:14-CV-3719-K (N.D. Tex. Aug. 20, 2016)

Summary

In Reynolds v. Dallas County, 207 S.W.2d 362, our Supreme Court held that courts of civil appeals did not have authority to extend said 15 day period for filing a motion for rehearing, even if good cause for such delay was shown.

Summary of this case from Dixieland Petroleum Corp. v. Brown

Opinion

No. 3:14-CV-3719-K

08-20-2016

LaDEREK REYNOLDS, (ID# 1945321) Plaintiff, v. DALLAS COUNTY JAIL PSYCH DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. The case will be dismissed by separate judgment for failure to prosecute or follow court orders.

SO ORDERED.

Signed August 20th, 2016.

/s/ _________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Reynolds v. Dall. Cnty. Jail Psych Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 20, 2016
No. 3:14-CV-3719-K (N.D. Tex. Aug. 20, 2016)

In Reynolds v. Dallas County, 207 S.W.2d 362, our Supreme Court held that courts of civil appeals did not have authority to extend said 15 day period for filing a motion for rehearing, even if good cause for such delay was shown.

Summary of this case from Dixieland Petroleum Corp. v. Brown
Case details for

Reynolds v. Dall. Cnty. Jail Psych Dep't

Case Details

Full title:LaDEREK REYNOLDS, (ID# 1945321) Plaintiff, v. DALLAS COUNTY JAIL PSYCH…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 20, 2016

Citations

No. 3:14-CV-3719-K (N.D. Tex. Aug. 20, 2016)

Citing Cases

Harrison v. Benavides

The motion does not meet the requirements of Rule 386, T.R.C.P., which provisions are mandatory and…

Dixieland Petroleum Corp. v. Brown

On October 20th, appellant tendered for filing its motion for rehearing. Appellant's motion for rehearing was…