From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. Boyle

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Mar 9, 2017
No. 16-20023 (5th Cir. Mar. 9, 2017)

Opinion

No. 16-20023

03-09-2017

LAUREN E. REYNOLDS, Petitioner-Appellant v. MARNE BOYLE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee


Summary Calendar Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:15-CV-2450 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------

Lauren Elizabeth Reynolds, federal prisoner # 86893-180, was convicted in the Northern District of Texas on her guilty plea to post-felony possession of a firearm and was sentenced to a 120-month prison term and a three-year term of supervised release. United States v. Reynolds, 427 F. App'x 316, 316 (5th Cir. 2011) (affirming the judgment). In 2015, Reynolds instituted the instant case in the Southern District of Texas under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to challenge her conviction and sentence. Concluding that Reynolds failed to show any basis for a challenge under § 2241, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Government, dismissing the case with prejudice and finding it frivolous. Also, the district court denied leave to proceed IFP on appeal because the court deemed the appeal to be in bad faith.

Now Reynolds seeks our permission to proceed IFP on appeal to question the district court's denial of IFP status and certification that her appeal is not in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997); FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(3). An appeal is frivolous if it "lacks an arguable basis in law or fact." Taylor v. Johnson, 257 F.3d 470, 472 (5th Cir. 2001).

Because Reynolds does not show that her appeal presents a nonfrivolous issue, see id.; see also Garland v. Roy, 615 F.3d 391, 394 (5th Cir. 2010); United States v. Reyes-Requena, 243 F.3d 893, 900-06 (5th Cir. 2001), she has failed to make the showing required to obtain leave to proceed IFP. Accordingly, her IFP motion is DENIED and this appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2; FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(3). Additionally, we WARN Reynolds that frivolous, repetitive, or otherwise abusive filings will invite the imposition of sanctions, which may include dismissal, monetary sanctions, and restrictions on her ability to file pleadings in this court and any court subject to this court's jurisdiction. See Coghlan v. Starkey, 852 F.2d 806, 817 n.21 (5th Cir. 1988).


Summaries of

Reynolds v. Boyle

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Mar 9, 2017
No. 16-20023 (5th Cir. Mar. 9, 2017)
Case details for

Reynolds v. Boyle

Case Details

Full title:LAUREN E. REYNOLDS, Petitioner-Appellant v. MARNE BOYLE, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 9, 2017

Citations

No. 16-20023 (5th Cir. Mar. 9, 2017)

Citing Cases

Smith v. MedLegal Sols. (In re Smith)

The above articulation comports with the long-standing principle that “[a]n appeal is frivolous if it ‘lacks…

Kenneth Michael Wright, L.L.C. v. Kite Bros., L.L.C. (In re Kite)

Turning then to the third issue, an appeal is frivolous "'if the result is obvious or the arguments of error…