From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds et Ux. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A
May 2, 1932
141 So. 298 (Fla. 1932)

Opinion

Decision filed May 2, 1932.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Harry G. Taylor, Judge.

C. E. Kensinger, for Appellants;

Swearingen Wilson, for Appellee.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

BUFORD, C.J., AND ELLIS AND BROWN, J.J., concur.


Summaries of

Reynolds et Ux. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A
May 2, 1932
141 So. 298 (Fla. 1932)
Case details for

Reynolds et Ux. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:B. H. REYNOLDS and ALMA V. REYNOLDS, his wife, Appellants, vs…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division A

Date published: May 2, 1932

Citations

141 So. 298 (Fla. 1932)
141 So. 298

Citing Cases

Harbeson v. Mering

"The consideration required to support a simple contract need not be money or anything having monetary value,…

Dorman, et Vir. v. Publix-Saenger-Sparks Theatres, Inc.

The consideration required to support a simple contract need not be money or anything having monetary value,…