From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Restrepo v. Weber Baking Co.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Jun 19, 1931
115 Cal.App. 111 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)

Opinion

Docket No. 6807.

June 19, 1931.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Leon R. Yankwich, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

C.H. Scharnikow for Appellant.

Kidd, Schell Delamer and Patrick J. Cooney for Respondents.


[1] Upon this appeal the plaintiff seeks to reverse a judgment, in disregard of a mass of positive evidence which unquestionably warranted the findings in favor of the defendants below. Much substantial evidence upon which the findings of fact and judgment were based is overlooked by the appellant, and a reading of the testimony discloses that indispensable considerations which occupied the attention of the witnesses and trial court in determining controlling facts, are omitted from the record before us. Since the appeal is founded entirely upon criticisms of the findings of fact, all intendments being resolved in favor of their correctness, the obvious conflict of evidence leaves nothing for review upon appeal. There is neither reason nor favorable judicial precedent for appellant asking us to enter into a particular examination of such evidence in order merely to dispute the decision of a question of fact and to vindicate his contrary view.

The judgment is affirmed.

Thompson (Ira F.), and Archbald, J., pro tem., concurred.


Summaries of

Restrepo v. Weber Baking Co.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Jun 19, 1931
115 Cal.App. 111 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
Case details for

Restrepo v. Weber Baking Co.

Case Details

Full title:L. RESTREPO, Appellant, v. WEBER BAKING COMPANY (a Corporation) et al.…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Jun 19, 1931

Citations

115 Cal.App. 111 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
300 P. 980

Citing Cases

Redmond v. City of Burbank

[1] If there be substantial evidence to support a finding of fact, it will not be disturbed by the appellate…

Lorraine v. City of Los Angeles

This precise question was raised in the case of Redmond v. City of Burbank, 43 Cal.App.2d 711, 713 [ 111 P.2d…