From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reserve Life Insurance Company v. Ayers

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 9, 1963
131 S.E.2d 122 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)

Opinion

40067.

DECIDED APRIL 9, 1963. REHEARING DENIED APRIL 22, 1963.

Action on insurance policy. Columbia Superior Court. Before Judge Anderson.

Eugene M. Kerr, for plaintiff in error.

Randall Evans, Jr., contra.


1. The motion to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that there is no final judgment is denied. The judgment of the trial court awarded attorney's fees in a fixed sum based upon the pleadings and evidence. The provision in the order stating that ". . . if there is `successful resistance to future litigation' the matter should be left open for assessment of reasonable attorney's fees for such services as may be required to be rendered hereafter" is clearly illegal and will be treated by this court as mere surplusage.

2. The petition seeking attorney's fees because of alleged bad faith of the defendant insurance company does not show on its face that the fee claimed was excessive as a matter of law.

3. Where the plaintiff's and defendant's witnesses differed widely in their opinion as to the value of counsel services and the trial court awarded an attorney fee within the range of such conflicting testimony, this court is without authority to reverse the judgment of the trial court denying the motion for new trial on the ground that such fee was excessive. Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Ayers, 217 Ga. 206 ( 121 S.E.2d 649).

Judgment affirmed. Carlisle, P. J., Bell and Hall, JJ., concur.

DECIDED APRIL 9, 1963 — REHEARING DENIED APRIL 22, 1963.


Summaries of

Reserve Life Insurance Company v. Ayers

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 9, 1963
131 S.E.2d 122 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)
Case details for

Reserve Life Insurance Company v. Ayers

Case Details

Full title:RESERVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. AYERS

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 9, 1963

Citations

131 S.E.2d 122 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)
131 S.E.2d 122

Citing Cases

Carlson v. Carlson

"Where the judgment of the trial court awards damages within the range of the conflicting testimony, this…

Campo Construction v. Stembridge

The upper range of the alleged damages was indicated in the amended pleadings and supported by testimony…