From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Requeno v. Integon General Ins. Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1992
421 S.E.2d 784 (N.C. 1992)

Opinion

No. 603PA90

(Filed 4 September 1992)

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-31 prior to determination by the Court of Appeals of a declaratory judgment for defendant entered by Allsbrook, J., at the 5 November 1990 Session of Superior Court, HARNETT County. Heard in the Supreme Court 16 October 1991.

Kelly West, by J. Thomas West and G. Michael Malone, for plaintiff appellant.

Walter L. Horton, Jr. for defendant appellee.

Paul D. Coates and ToNola D. Brown, for Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company as amicus curiae.

Glenn, Mills, Fisher, P.A., by Stewart W. Fisher, for the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers as amicus curiae.


This is an action to determine whether the uninsured motorist coverages in an insurance policy issued by the defendant should be stacked. The superior court held that the coverages should not be stacked. The plaintiff appealed.


We affirm the judgment of the superior court for the reasons stated in Lanning v. Allstate Insurance Company, No. 288PA91, filed today.

AFFIRMED.

Justices Frye and Lake did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Requeno v. Integon General Ins. Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1992
421 S.E.2d 784 (N.C. 1992)
Case details for

Requeno v. Integon General Ins. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS REQUENO v. INTEGON GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1992

Citations

421 S.E.2d 784 (N.C. 1992)
421 S.E.2d 784

Citing Cases

Lanning v. Allstate Insurance Co.

25 ALR4th 896. On petition for discretionary review prior to determination by the Court of Appeals, pursuant…

Bailey v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co.

" Lanning, 332 at 314, 382 S.E.2d at 183. Therefore, our Supreme Court held that the Financial Responsibility…