From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

REMY v. HDR ENGINEERING, INC.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 12, 2005
Case No. 2:05-CV-00322-LKK-PAN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 2:05-CV-00322-LKK-PAN.

September 12, 2005

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP, Kurt A. Kappes, Min Ho Lee, Sacramento, California. Attorneys for Defendants HDR ENGINEERING, INC. and JACK ALLEN. Attorneys for Defendants.

BEYER, PONGRATZ ROSEN, Etan Rosen, Attorneys for Plaintiff CAMILLE REMY.


STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER THEREON (FED. R.CIV. P. 41(A)(1))


The parties to this action have reached a resolution of the dispute and hereby stipulate that the action under this case number should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), with each party to bear their own attorneys fees and costs, and with no party determined to be a prevailing party for any purpose.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

REMY v. HDR ENGINEERING, INC.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 12, 2005
Case No. 2:05-CV-00322-LKK-PAN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2005)
Case details for

REMY v. HDR ENGINEERING, INC.

Case Details

Full title:CAMILLE REMY Plaintiff, v. HDR ENGINEERING, INC., JACK ALLEN; and DOES 1…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 12, 2005

Citations

Case No. 2:05-CV-00322-LKK-PAN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2005)

Citing Cases

Stagner v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.

As noted above, neither Austria and Chen appear to have been served. If Plaintiff intends to pursue her…