From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Remington-Rand Bus. v. Angelo Printing

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin
Sep 10, 1930
31 S.W.2d 1098 (Tex. Civ. App. 1930)

Opinion

No. 7499.

September 10, 1930.

Error from Tom Green County Court; J. T. Mathison, Judge.

Action by Angelo Printing Company against Remington-Rand Business Service, Inc. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

Reversed and remanded.

J. A. W. Simson, of Buffalo, N.Y., and Cunningham Oliver, Amo Fitzpatrick, and Bruce E. Oliver, all of Abilene, for plaintiff in error.


Appeal by writ of error from a default judgment against appellant, a foreign corporation, for $245 upon an alleged rental contract.

We sustain two of appellant's assignments of error complaining of the sufficiency of the citation and service thereof in the following particulars:

1. Neither the pleading, citation, return, nor the record shows that the party upon whom service was had was such agent as the statutes require service to be had upon in suits against foreign corporations. R.S. art. 2031; Western Cottage Piano Organ Co. v. Anderson 97 Tex. 432, 79 S.W. 516; Holcomb v. Amason (Tex.Civ.App.) 2 S.W.2d 360.

2. The return shows that the citation was "served" on the party named, as agent, but fails to show the manner of service, and the record nowhere shows that service was in the manner required by statute. R.S. art. 2034; Sun Mut. Ins. Co. v. Seeligson, 59 Tex. 3: Continental Ins. Co. v. Milliken, 64 Tex. 46.

The trial court's judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded to that court for further trial.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Remington-Rand Bus. v. Angelo Printing

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin
Sep 10, 1930
31 S.W.2d 1098 (Tex. Civ. App. 1930)
Case details for

Remington-Rand Bus. v. Angelo Printing

Case Details

Full title:REMINGTON-RAND BUSINESS SERVICE, Inc., v. ANGELO PRINTING CO

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin

Date published: Sep 10, 1930

Citations

31 S.W.2d 1098 (Tex. Civ. App. 1930)

Citing Cases

Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Miller

The statement that service was made by serving McIntosh, the agent, is the statement of a conclusion, and not…