From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reliance Ins. v. Certain Member

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 28, 1995
99 F.3d 402 (2d Cir. 1995)

Summary

finding that it was not coercive for trial judge to state that he had previously imposed longer sentences on other defendants

Summary of this case from Gaines v. Murray

Opinion

No. 95-7700.

December 28, 1995.

S.D.N.Y., 886 F.Supp. 1147.


DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Reliance Ins. v. Certain Member

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 28, 1995
99 F.3d 402 (2d Cir. 1995)

finding that it was not coercive for trial judge to state that he had previously imposed longer sentences on other defendants

Summary of this case from Gaines v. Murray

explaining that no "double count[ing]" occurred under U.S.S.G. §§ 2C1.1(b) and 3B1.1(c) because "these sections concern different aspects of . . . criminal conduct"

Summary of this case from United States v. Watson
Case details for

Reliance Ins. v. Certain Member

Case Details

Full title:Reliance Ins. Co. v. Certain Member Companies, Institute of London…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Dec 28, 1995

Citations

99 F.3d 402 (2d Cir. 1995)

Citing Cases

McGrath v. Nassau Health Care Corp.

"The elements of an equal protection sexual harassment claim are not coextensive with the elements of a Title…

Principal Nat'l Life Ins. Co. v. Coassin

"'The test of materiality is in the effect which the knowledge of the fact in question would have on the…