From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rejewski v. Rejewski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 28, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Howe, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and judgment vacated in part in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying defendant's motion to vacate in part the judgment entered upon the matrimonial Referee's report (see, CPLR 5015 [a]). Although a client may, with or without cause, discharge an attorney, "an attorney of record in an action may only withdraw or be changed or discharged in the manner prescribed by statute" (Moustakas v Bouloukos, 112 A.D.2d 981, 983; see, CPLR 321 [b]). CPLR 321 (b) (1) provides, in pertinent part, that "an attorney of record may be changed by filing with the clerk a consent to the change signed by the retiring attorney and signed and acknowledged by the party." Although plaintiff contends that defendant consented to his attorney's withdrawal, the record is devoid of evidence that defendant executed a consent for his attorney to withdraw. After defendant's attorney purportedly withdrew as counsel and in defendant's absence, plaintiff testified extensively before the Referee, who then issued his findings. We, therefore, grant defendant's motion and vacate all parts of the judgment on appeal except that part divorcing the parties.


Summaries of

Rejewski v. Rejewski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Rejewski v. Rejewski

Case Details

Full title:MAUREEN A. REJEWSKI, Respondent, v. MARTIN J. REJEWSKI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 711

Citing Cases

Sweet v. Sweet

The validity of actions taken by a pro se litigant where her attorney of record has not followed the proper…