From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reiss v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1959
9 A.D.2d 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Opinion

November 30, 1959


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, and for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from a judgment entered on a jury's verdict in favor of respondents. Respondent Hermine Reiss, then an infant, was injured while a guest in appellants' motor vehicle which collided with another motor vehicle in the State of Massachusetts. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Under established decisions of the State of Massachusetts, a guest may recover from his host only upon proof of gross negligence. ( Lefeave v. Ascher, 292 Mass. 336; Altman v. Aronson, 231 Mass. 588; Massaletti v. Fitzroy, 228 Mass. 487.) In our opinion, the facts warranted a finding of gross negligence. Nolan, P.J., Beldock and Hallinan, JJ., concur; Wenzel and Ughetta, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint on the ground that a sudden, single, precipitate act does not per se constitute "gross negligence", which has been defined as "more than a mere want of due care" ( Desroches v. Holland, 285 Mass. 495, 498).


Summaries of

Reiss v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1959
9 A.D.2d 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)
Case details for

Reiss v. Klein

Case Details

Full title:HERMINE REISS et al., Respondents, v. JACOB KLEIN et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1959

Citations

9 A.D.2d 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)