From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reisman v. Commonwealth Abstract Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 13, 1979
71 A.D.2d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

August 13, 1979


In an action to recover damages arising out of an allegedly defective title search and the resultant aborted sale of real property, defendant Metropolitan Title Guaranty Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 6, 1978, which denied its motion, inter alia, to dismiss each of the causes of action of the complaint as against it. Order modified, on the law, by deleting the second decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefor provisions (1) granting the motion to the limited extent of (a) dismissing plaintiffs' third cause of action as against appellant, and (b) striking the demand for punitive damages and (2) denying the balance of the appellant's motion. As so modified, order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant. In our opinion, plaintiffs' third cause of action is legally insufficient and fails to state a claim upon which relief may be predicated. We further believe that the allegations of the complaint, when viewed as a whole, are legally insufficient to support an award of punitive damages (see M.S.R. Assoc. v Consolidated Mut. Ins. Co., 58 A.D.2d 858; Buttignol Constr. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 22 A.D.2d 689). Damiani, J.P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reisman v. Commonwealth Abstract Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 13, 1979
71 A.D.2d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Reisman v. Commonwealth Abstract Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HARVEY B. REISMAN et al., Respondents, v. COMMONWEALTH ABSTRACT CO., INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 13, 1979

Citations

71 A.D.2d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Calamari v. Grace

The court left open the possibility that the insurer could have been held liable for any fraud surrounding…