From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reichelderfer v. Quinn

Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Dec 7, 1931
53 F.2d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 1931)

Opinion

No. 5230.

Submitted November 6, 1931.

Decided December 7, 1931.

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.

William W. Bride and Robert E. Lynch, both of Washington, D.C., for appellants.

Henry I. Quinn and George E. Sullivan, both of Washington, D.C., for appellees.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, HITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.


It is agreed by counsel that the issue presented in this appeal and also the parties involved are identical with those appearing in Quinn et al. v. Dougherty et al., Commissioners of the District of Columbia, decided by this court January 7, 1929, 58 App. D.C. 339, 30 F.2d 749. It is only necessary now to say that, consistently with our decision in the former case, we affirm the decree of the lower court herein appealed from.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Reichelderfer v. Quinn

Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Dec 7, 1931
53 F.2d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 1931)
Case details for

Reichelderfer v. Quinn

Case Details

Full title:Luther H. REICHELDERFER, Herbert B. Crosby, and John C. Gotwals…

Court:Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia

Date published: Dec 7, 1931

Citations

53 F.2d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 1931)

Citing Cases

Stevens v. Mayor and Council of City of Vinita

In this connection in said annotations it is interesting to note that some of the cases indicate that…

Barnes v. City of Gadsden, Alabama

Rather, the questions are whether the plaintiffs will suffer a legal wrong and whether, at the present stage,…