From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reich v. Reich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 2000
272 A.D.2d 313 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted February 23, 2000.

May 3, 2000.

In a matrimonial action, Philip L. Friedman, the former attorney of record for the defendant husband, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), dated December 14, 1999, which, inter alia, denied his motion to fix his attorney's lien and directed him to turn over his former client's file to new counsel.

Philip L. Friedman, New York, N.Y., nonparty appellant pro se.

LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., DANIEL W. JOY, WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motion is granted to the extent that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for an expedited hearing in accordance herewith, and is otherwise denied.

There is insufficient evidence to resolve the question of whether the appellant `s withdrawal as attorney was on consent, or was otherwise justifiable, so as to entitle him to a retaining lien (see, Kahn v. Kahn, 186 A.D.2d 719; see also, Katsaros v. Katsaros, 152 A.D.2d 539; Allen v. Rivera, 125 A.D.2d 278). The Supreme Court therefore erred in directing him to turn over the file before an expedited hearing on this issue, and, if necessary, on the issue of the amount due on the basis of quantum meruit. The matter is therefore remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for such a hearing.

BRACKEN, J.P., JOY, THOMPSON, GOLDSTEIN and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reich v. Reich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 2000
272 A.D.2d 313 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Reich v. Reich

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA REICH, plaintiff, v. LARRY S. REICH, respondent; PHILIP L…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 3, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 313 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 896

Citing Cases

Rotker v. Rotker

ing it is found that there was cause for the discharge, the matter is resolved, because both the entitlement…

Rotker v. Rotker

use for the discharge, the matter is resolved, because both the entitlement of the plaintiff's former…