From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reiber v. City of Pullman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Feb 20, 2013
NO: 11-CV-0129-TOR (E.D. Wash. Feb. 20, 2013)

Opinion

NO: 11-CV-0129-TOR

02-20-2013

ERIC REIBER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF PULLMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS'

MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION

WITH LEAVE TO RENEW

BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiffs' Motion to Substitute the Estate of Patrick Wilkins as a party for Defendant Patrick Wilkins (ECF No. 108). This matter was heard without oral argument on February 15, 2013. The Court has reviewed the briefing and the record and files herein, and is fully informed.

DISCUSSION

Plaintiffs seek to substitute the Estate of Patrick Wilkins as a party for Defendant Patrick Wilkins, who passed away on November 16, 2012. Motions for substitution are governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25. Under Rule 25(a), a court may substitute a proper party in interest for a deceased party whose death has been noted on the record, provided that the party seeking substitution has served (1) its motion to substitute, and (2) a statement noting the death on the record, upon the existing parties and the non-party to be substituted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(3). See Barlow v. Ground, 39 F.3d 231, 233 (9th Cir. 1994) (explaining that motion to substitute and suggestion of death must be served upon non-party successors or representatives of the deceased party "in the manner provided by Rule 4 for service of a summons").

Here, Plaintiffs filed a suggestion of death of Defendant Patrick Wilkins and a motion to substitute the Estate of Patrick Wilkins in his stead on January 17, 2013. ECF Nos. 108, 111. However, the record does not reflect that these two documents were ever served upon the Estate of Patrick Wilkins. Although Plaintiffs' appear to have served summonses on both the attorney for the Estate and the personal representative of the Estate, (ECF No. 120), the returns of service do not indicate which documents (if any) were attached to the summonses. In the absence of proof that Plaintiffs' suggestion of death and motion to substitute have been properly served, the Court cannot order substitution under Rule 25(a). Barlow, 39 F.3d at 233-34. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion to substitute is denied with leave to renew.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Plaintiffs' Motion to Substitute the Estate of Patrick Wilkins as a party for Defendant Patrick Wilkins (ECF No. 108) is DENIED with leave to renew.

The District Court Executive is hereby directed to enter this Order and provide copies to counsel.

THOMAS O. RICE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Reiber v. City of Pullman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Feb 20, 2013
NO: 11-CV-0129-TOR (E.D. Wash. Feb. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Reiber v. City of Pullman

Case Details

Full title:ERIC REIBER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF PULLMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Date published: Feb 20, 2013

Citations

NO: 11-CV-0129-TOR (E.D. Wash. Feb. 20, 2013)