From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reeves v. U.S.

U.S.
Oct 15, 2002
537 U.S. 965 (2002)

Summary

In Reeves, the Court of Federal Claims rejected a mining company's Fifth Amendment takings claim that the President's designation of land as a national monument on which it held validly staked, unpatented mining claims, worked a regulatory taking of its property interest.

Summary of this case from Seven Up Pete Venture v. State

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.

No. 02-6291.

October 15, 2002.


C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 32 Fed. Appx. 68.


Summaries of

Reeves v. U.S.

U.S.
Oct 15, 2002
537 U.S. 965 (2002)

In Reeves, the Court of Federal Claims rejected a mining company's Fifth Amendment takings claim that the President's designation of land as a national monument on which it held validly staked, unpatented mining claims, worked a regulatory taking of its property interest.

Summary of this case from Seven Up Pete Venture v. State
Case details for

Reeves v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:REEVES v. UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 15, 2002

Citations

537 U.S. 965 (2002)

Citing Cases

Seven Up Pete Venture v. State

The State notes that paragraph 7 in the Mineral Leases also conditioned the Venture's development of the…