Summary
finding that the plaintiff's claims arose out of the defendant's forum-related activities in a trademark infringement action where some of the defendant's advertisement and sales activity was directed toward the forum state
Summary of this case from Adidas Am., Inc. v. Cougar Sport, Inc.Opinion
The panel unanimously finds these cases suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4.
Editorial Note:
This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Nos. CV-94-01291-DFL, CV-94-01292-DFL; David F. Levi, District Judge, Presiding.
E.D.Cal., 1994 WL 782235.
AFFIRMED.
Before: ALARC§N, CANBY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
In these consolidated appeals, William T. Reeves and Susan M. Reeves (the "plaintiffs") appeal pro se the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim and for lack of jurisdiction of their actions brought under the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 552 & 552a. The plaintiffs sought, among other things, disclosure of the statutory and regulatory bases for their tax liability for the tax years 1980 through 1993. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir.1989), and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its orders filed on November 16, 1994, granting the defendant's motions to dismiss.
AFFIRMED.