From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reeves v. Midmichigan Health

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 6, 2011
489 Mich. 908 (Mich. 2011)

Summary

In Reeves, the Supreme Court reversed this Court's conclusion that a question of fact existed with respect to ostensible agency for reasons set forth in the Court of Appeals' dissenting opinion.

Summary of this case from Markel v. William Beaumont Hosp.

Opinion

NO. 142059.

May 6, 2011.

Court of Appeals No. 291855.


Summary Disposition May 6, 2011.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals, for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion, and we reinstate the November 18, 2008m order of the Gratiot Circuit Court granting Gratiot Medical Center summary disposition.

MARILYN KELLY and HATHAWAY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.


Summaries of

Reeves v. Midmichigan Health

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 6, 2011
489 Mich. 908 (Mich. 2011)

In Reeves, the Supreme Court reversed this Court's conclusion that a question of fact existed with respect to ostensible agency for reasons set forth in the Court of Appeals' dissenting opinion.

Summary of this case from Markel v. William Beaumont Hosp.
Case details for

Reeves v. Midmichigan Health

Case Details

Full title:REEVES v. MIDMICHIGAN HEALTH

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: May 6, 2011

Citations

489 Mich. 908 (Mich. 2011)

Citing Cases

Markel v. William Beaumont Hosp.

We also note that patient testimony is not required to establish ostensible agency under Grewe . Judge…

People v. Terry

MARILYN J. KELLY, J. (concurring).           [489 Mich. 908] I concur fully with the order reversing…