From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Reed

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Apr 5, 2019
268 So. 3d 206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 5D18-1120

04-05-2019

Jacob A. REED, Appellant, v. Melissa Sexton REED, Appellee.

Jacob A. Reed, Edgewater, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.


Jacob A. Reed, Edgewater, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that, in appellate proceedings, the trial court's decision carries a presumption of correctness and, thus, the appellant has the burden to bring forth an adequate record to demonstrate error); Mathieu v. Mathieu, 877 So.2d 740, 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (treating the challenge to adequate findings as unpreserved error unless previously brought to the trial court's attention in a motion for rehearing).

BERGER, LAMBERT, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reed v. Reed

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Apr 5, 2019
268 So. 3d 206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Reed v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:JACOB A. REED, Appellant, v. MELISSA SEXTON REED, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 5, 2019

Citations

268 So. 3d 206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. St. George v. Justice Court

Iowa, 186; Cheek v. Preston, 34 Ind. App. 343, 72 N.E. 1048; Montgomery v. Adams, 51 Ala. 449 (and other…