From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION
Aug 21, 2012
No. 1:12-cv-00010 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 21, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1:12-cv-00010

08-21-2012

CINDY LYNN REED, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Judge Nixon

Magistrate Judge Brown


ORDER

On January 20, 2012, Plaintiff Cindy Lynn Reed filed a Complaint for review of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's decision denying her application for Social Security Disability benefits. (Doc. No. 1). Defendant filed an Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 6), along with the administrative record (Doc. No. 7). On March 21, 2012, Magistrate Judge Brown entered an Order providing that Plaintiff was to file a motion for judgment on the administrative record within thirty days of the entry of the Order. (Doc. No. 8.) On May 11, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file a motion for judgment on the administrative record (Doc. No. 9), which Magistrate Judge Brown granted—allowing Plaintiff until June 12, 2012 to file her motion (Doc. No. 10). Plaintiff had not filed such a motion by June 12, 2012, and thus Magistrate Judge Brown issued an Order on July 13, 2012, indicating that if Plaintiff did not file a motion within fourteen days of that Order's entry, he would enter a report and recommendation recommending that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Doc. No. 11.) Plaintiff, once again, failed to comply with Magistrate Judge Brown's Order, and did not file anything by the July 27, 2012 deadline.

Magistrate Judge Brown subsequently issued a Report and Recommendation ("Report"), recommending that the action be dismissed. (Doc. No. 12 at 4.) The Report was filed on August 2, 2012, and it provided a period of fourteen days in which either party could file an objection. (Id.)Neither party has filed an objection to date.

Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute, and the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case.

It is so ORDERED.

________

JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Reed v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION
Aug 21, 2012
No. 1:12-cv-00010 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Reed v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CINDY LYNN REED, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION

Date published: Aug 21, 2012

Citations

No. 1:12-cv-00010 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 21, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States ex rel. CIMZNHCA, LLC v. UCB, Inc.

At the hearing, the government cited the following: Medicare and State Health Care Programs, HHS Final Rule,…