From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redwood Empire Life Support v. County of Sonoma

U.S.
Jan 18, 2000
528 U.S. 1116 (2000)

Summary

holding plaintiff abandoned claims by failing to respond to defendant's arguments in motion to dismiss

Summary of this case from Eglen v. America Online, Inc., (S.D.Ind. 2001)

Opinion

No. 99-640.

January 18, 2000.

C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.


Reported below: 190 F. 3d 949.


Summaries of

Redwood Empire Life Support v. County of Sonoma

U.S.
Jan 18, 2000
528 U.S. 1116 (2000)

holding plaintiff abandoned claims by failing to respond to defendant's arguments in motion to dismiss

Summary of this case from Eglen v. America Online, Inc., (S.D.Ind. 2001)

holding plaintiff abandoned claims by failing to respond to defendant's arguments in motion to dismiss

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc, (S.D.Ind. 2001)

upholding challenge to section 922(g) by a police officer who lost his job because he could not possess a firearm after being convicted of domestic violence

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Fleischli

allowing private party to bring Tenth Amendment challenge

Summary of this case from Warren v. United States

allowing private party to bring Tenth Amendment challenge

Summary of this case from Warren v. United States

stating that municipal departments are not generally able to sued independently from the municipality

Summary of this case from King v. City of Chicago Dept. of Streets Sanitation
Case details for

Redwood Empire Life Support v. County of Sonoma

Case Details

Full title:REDWOOD EMPIRE LIFE SUPPORT v. COUNTY OF SONOMA ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 18, 2000

Citations

528 U.S. 1116 (2000)

Citing Cases

Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods, Inc.

The term "motivating factor" is also routinely not defined in several other contexts. See Lambert v.…

Seegars v. Ashcroft

In concluding that plaintiff Hailes' Second Amendment challenge to D.C. Code § 7-2507.02 is legally distinct…