From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redwind v. W. Union LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jul 12, 2019
No. 3:18-cv-2094-SB (D. Or. Jul. 12, 2019)

Opinion

No. 3:18-cv-2094-SB

07-12-2019

SAGE REDWIND, Plaintiff, v. WESTERN UNION LLC, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER MOSMAN, J.,

On June 21, 2019, Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued her Findings and Recommendation (F&R) [50] and recommended granting Defendant Western Union LLC's (Western Union) Motion [5] to dismiss Plaintiff Sage Redwind's pay discrimination claim and denying Western Union's Motion [5] for partial dismissal of Ms. Redwind's retaliation and discrimination claims. Judge Beckerman also denied Ms. Redwind's Motion [15] for sanctions. Ms. Redwind filed objections, and Western Union responded.

I denied Ms. Redwind's Motion for leave to reply to Western Union's objections on the basis that additional briefing would not aid in my review of the F&R. [55]. --------

DISCUSSION

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendations as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The court, however, is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny with which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Upon careful review, I agree with Judge Beckerman's recommendations to grant the Motion [5] to dismiss Ms. Redwind's pay discrimination claim and deny the Motion [5] for partial dismissal of her retaliation and discrimination claims and ADOPT the F&R as my own opinion. To the extent necessary, I also adopt Judge Beckerman's denial of Ms. Redwind's Motion [15] for sanctions. I grant Ms. Redwind fourteen days from the date this Opinion and Order to file an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies discussed in Judge Beckerman's F&R. This matter is referred back to Judge Beckerman.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 12 day of July, 2019.

/s/_________

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Redwind v. W. Union LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jul 12, 2019
No. 3:18-cv-2094-SB (D. Or. Jul. 12, 2019)
Case details for

Redwind v. W. Union LLC

Case Details

Full title:SAGE REDWIND, Plaintiff, v. WESTERN UNION LLC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jul 12, 2019

Citations

No. 3:18-cv-2094-SB (D. Or. Jul. 12, 2019)

Citing Cases

Pinnacle Ventures LLC v. Bertelsmann Educ. Servs.

However, several district courts within the Ninth Circuit have found that "[b]y its own terms, there does not…

Jakobsen v. Burros

To the extent Plaintiffs seek attorneys' fees only as an aspect of damages on another claim, Rule 12(b)(6)…