From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reddy v. Jones

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Aug 12, 1976
419 F. Supp. 1391 (W.D.N.C. 1976)

Summary

In Reddy v. Jones, 419 F. Supp. 1391 (W.D.N.C. 1976), the judge held that disqualification was not required because one of the judge's law clerks accepted employment with lawyers representing the petitioners.

Summary of this case from Miller Industries v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.

Opinion

No. C-C-76-118.

August 12, 1976.

James E. Ferguson, II, James C. Fuller, Jr., Chambers, Stein, Ferguson Becton, Charlotte, N.C., for plaintiffs.

Richard N. League, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, N.C., for defendants.


A motion to disqualify the undersigned judge has been filed by Mr. League, the Assistant Attorney General handling this case. It alleges no bias or partiality on my part, but it does allege that I should disqualify myself because one of my law clerks, John Gresham, has accepted employment with lawyers representing the petitioners.

The unvaried custom which I have followed since I was first appointed has been that if a law clerk accepts future employment with a law firm, he is immediately taken off all work, conference, hearings or other activity, including the delivery of messages, in cases being tried in this court by his prospective employers. This system has produced no difficulty or complication involving any of the eight clerks who have while employed here made arrangements for future employment by law firms with cases in this court.

With respect to the racial suggestions in Mr. League's motion, this court has been heavily supplied with racial problems since 1968, and this case is not unique in that regard. With reference to the veiled suggestion in paragraph 5 that Mr. Gresham has worked on this case or any other cases involving his prospective employers at any time since he agreed to work for them, Mr. League is mistaken about the facts; the message brought to the court by Mr. Gresham during the bond hearing dealt with a totally unrelated matter.

This court has no desire to try any case in which a conflict of interest or other basis for disqualification exists. Nevertheless, motions to disqualify should not be lightly filed; this one is not lightly considered by the court; it has no merit and is denied.


Summaries of

Reddy v. Jones

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Aug 12, 1976
419 F. Supp. 1391 (W.D.N.C. 1976)

In Reddy v. Jones, 419 F. Supp. 1391 (W.D.N.C. 1976), the judge held that disqualification was not required because one of the judge's law clerks accepted employment with lawyers representing the petitioners.

Summary of this case from Miller Industries v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.
Case details for

Reddy v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:Thomas James REDDY et al., Petitioners, v. David L. JONES, Secretary…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Aug 12, 1976

Citations

419 F. Supp. 1391 (W.D.N.C. 1976)

Citing Cases

Strategic Technologies, Inc. v. Cooper

There is no evidence of any participation by Mr. Goldberg in the current case before Judge Winfield. The Hall…

State v. Doe

Despite this, the case was reversed because of the appearance of impropriety. In the two cases cited by the…