From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redding v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 2, 1987
738 S.W.2d 410 (Ark. 1987)

Summary

In Redding v. State, 293 Ark. 411, 738 S.W.2d 410 (1987), however, we held that "A sentence is placed into execution when the court issues a commitment order unless the trial court grants appellate bond or specifically delays execution upon other valid grounds."

Summary of this case from Johninson v. State

Opinion

No. CR 87-150

Opinion delivered November 2, 1987

1. APPEAL ERROR — NO APPEAL FROM GUILTY PLEA. — There is no appeal from a guilty plea. 2. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — WITHDRAWAL OF GUILTY PLEA. — The court, at any time before pronouncing sentence, may allow a defendant to withdraw his plea if it is fair and just to do so; however, a defendant has no right to withdraw a plea after it has been accepted by the court unless it is necessary to correct a manifest injustice. 3. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — EXECUTION OF SENTENCE. — A sentence is placed into execution when the court issues a commitment order unless the trial court grants appellate bond or specifically delays execution of sentence upon other valid grounds. 4. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — NO MODIFICATION AFTER EXECUTION. — Once a valid sentence has been put into execution, the trial court is without jurisdiction to modify, amend, or revise it. 5. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — SENTENCE PUT INTO EXECUTION — POWER TO CHANGE SENTENCE PASSES TO EXECUTIVE BRANCH. — after the sentence is put into execution the power to change the sentence passes from the trial court to the executive branch of government.

Upon Review of the Decision of the Arkansas court of appeals; reversed and remanded.

Hurst Law Office, by: Larry Honeycutt, for appellant.

Steve Clark, Att'y Gen., by: Robert A. Ginnaven III, Asst. Att'y Gen., for appellee.


We granted review from the decision of the court of appeals, Division II, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29 (6). The court of appeals had affirmed the conviction of appellant who had been tried for sale of a controlled substance. This trial resulted after the trial judge set aside the appellant's guilty plea and sentence and granted a trial. We reverse the decision of the court of appeals and vacate the second sentence and reinstate the original sentence, which had been placed into execution before the change of plea was granted.

On December 20, 1985, the appellant entered a guilty plea to three counts of delivery of a controlled substance and on that same day was sentenced to an eight year term and a fine of $1000. Also on the same day an order of commitment to the Department of correction was issued and appellant was remanded to the custody of the sheriff for delivery to the Department of correction. On January 2, 1986, while awaiting transportation to the Department of correction, the trial court granted appellant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea of December 20, 1985. Upon his subsequent trial he was given ten years and fined $10,000.

This appeal is from the conviction and resulting sentence at the trial. One point argued on appeal is that the trial court lost jurisdiction after it accepted the guilty plea, pronounced sentence and issued a commitment order remanding the appellant to the custody of the sheriff to be delivered to the Department of correction. The Attorney General concedes that the trial court was without authority to vacate the original judgment and sentence. Since we agree with this argument we do not discuss the other issues raised on appeal. There is no right to appeal from a guilty plea.

[2-5] The court, at any time before pronouncing sentence, may allow a defendant to withdraw his plea if it is fair and just to do so. However, a defendant has no right to withdraw a plea after it has been accepted by the court unless it is necessary to correct a manifest injustice. See A.R.Cr.P. Rule 26.1. A. sentence is placed into execution when the court issues a commitment order unless the trial court grants appellate bond or specifically delays execution of sentence upon other valid grounds. Once a valid sentence has been put into execution, the trial court is without jurisdiction to modify, amend or revise it. Shipman v. State, 261 Ark. 559, 550 S.W.2d 424 (1977). after the sentence is put into execution the power to change the sentence passes from the trial court to the executive branch of government. Nelson. v. State, 284 Ark. 156, 680 S.W.2d 91 (1984).

In this case the sentence had already been pronounced and commitment issued before the trial court attempted to set the sentence aside. The trial court was without jurisdiction to do so and its order vacating the sentence was void. The case is remanded to the trial court with directions to reinstate the plea accepted and the sentence imposed on December 20, 1985.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Redding v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 2, 1987
738 S.W.2d 410 (Ark. 1987)

In Redding v. State, 293 Ark. 411, 738 S.W.2d 410 (1987), however, we held that "A sentence is placed into execution when the court issues a commitment order unless the trial court grants appellate bond or specifically delays execution upon other valid grounds."

Summary of this case from Johninson v. State
Case details for

Redding v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kimmy R. REDDING v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 2, 1987

Citations

738 S.W.2d 410 (Ark. 1987)
738 S.W.2d 410

Citing Cases

Scalco v. City of Russellville

We remand with instructions to the trial court to reinstate both the plea originally accepted and the…

Venable v. State

The courts have no inherent authority to modify a sentence after execution of that sentence has begun…