From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reddick v. United States Department of Justice

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jul 24, 2006
05-cv-256-SM (D.N.H. Jul. 24, 2006)

Opinion

05-CV-256-SM.

July 24, 2006


ORDER


Re: Document No. 17, Response re: Report and Recommendations

Ruling: The proposed order is approved as drafted and entered as an order of the court, subject to plaintiff's filing any objection he may have within thirty(30) days of the date of this order. (Plaintiff should understand that his remaining claims are being construed as a motion to set aside the prior forfeiture, that the prior forfeiture will be set aside, that the case will be closed, and that the government will likely begin forfeiture proceedings anew, giving plaintiff proper notice and opportunity to be heard.)


Summaries of

Reddick v. United States Department of Justice

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jul 24, 2006
05-cv-256-SM (D.N.H. Jul. 24, 2006)
Case details for

Reddick v. United States Department of Justice

Case Details

Full title:Dwayne A. Reddick v. United States Department of Justice, et al

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Jul 24, 2006

Citations

05-cv-256-SM (D.N.H. Jul. 24, 2006)

Citing Cases

Santos v. U.S.

See United States v. Schinnell, 80 F.3d 1064, 1069 (5th Cir. 1996) ("Once the administrative forfeiture [is]…