From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reddick v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 2, 2007
43 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 501096.

August 2, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Mitchell Reddick, Pine City, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur.


At the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of unauthorized organization activity and violating facility correspondence regulations. That determination was affirmed on administrative appeal and petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report, related documentary evidence and testimony adduced at the hearing, including the confidential testimony considered by the Hearing Officer in camera ( see Matter of Turner v Goord, 32 AD3d 1119, 1120, lv denied 8 NY3d 804). Petitioner's remaining arguments, to the extent they are preserved, including his claims that the Hearing Officer was biased and that he was improperly denied the right to present a defense and call certain witnesses, have been examined and found to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Reddick v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 2, 2007
43 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Reddick v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MITCHELL REDDICK, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Aug 2, 2007

Citations

43 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 6303
840 N.Y.S.2d 234

Citing Cases

Ubaldo v. Leclaire

We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior…

Toutpuissant v. Fischer

Inasmuch as a loss of good time was imposed, however, the matter must be remitted for a redetermination of…