From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reddick v. Cumberland County Prison

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 11, 2011
Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-1600 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-1600.

October 11, 2011


ORDER


THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

Presently pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge Carlsons's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. No. 7.) In his report, Judge Carlson recommends that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 4) be granted, but that Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. No. 1) be dismissed without prejudice, provided that Plaintiff correct the defects cited in the report within twenty days of a dismissal order (Doc. No. 7 at 16). No timely objections have been filed. On September 12, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion to amend his complaint. (Doc. No. 8.)

ACCORDINGLY, on this 11th day of October 2011, upon review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: ADOPTED. in forma pauperis GRANTED. REMANDED

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 7) is 2. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed is 3. The above-captioned case shall be to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Reddick v. Cumberland County Prison

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 11, 2011
Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-1600 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Reddick v. Cumberland County Prison

Case Details

Full title:MITCHELL REDDICK, Plaintiff v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-1600 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 11, 2011)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. W.U. Tel. Co.

was not then operating its telegraph lines, and evidence could not be properly received to disprove that…