From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redden v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Aug 28, 1986
492 So. 2d 1326 (Fla. 1986)

Opinion

No. 68093.

August 28, 1986.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Great Public Importance, Fourth District — Case No. 85-819.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Richard G. Bartmon, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.


We grant the petition for review of Redden v. State, 479 So.2d 236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), under article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. The district court incorporated by reference and certified the following question also certified in Jones v. State, 459 So.2d 475 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), to be of great public importance:

Harris v. State, 438 So.2d 787 (Fla. 1983), recognizes a constitutional right of an accused in a capital case to have the jury instructed as to necessarily lesser included offenses and that the violation of that right constitutes fundamental error, a waiver of which, to be effective, must be made on the record knowingly and intelligently by the accused personally rather than by counsel. Do those charged with non-capital crimes enjoy this constitutional right as well as those charged with capital crimes?

459 So.2d at 476. We answered this question in the negative in Jones v. State, 484 So.2d 577 (Fla. 1986). We, accordingly, approve the decision of the district court on the authority of Jones.

It is so ordered.

McDONALD, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Redden v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Aug 28, 1986
492 So. 2d 1326 (Fla. 1986)
Case details for

Redden v. State

Case Details

Full title:OPHELIA REDDEN, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Aug 28, 1986

Citations

492 So. 2d 1326 (Fla. 1986)

Citing Cases

The Florida Bar v. Nahoom

IV. Recommendation As To Disciplinary Measures To Be Applied: I recommend the Respondent be disbarred from…