From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reconsideration Docket

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 2001
755 N.E.2d 356 (Ohio 2001)

Summary

finding that the trial court's failure to offer any exposition of post-release control sanctions was not adequate and did not constitute substantial compliance with the trial court's responsibility

Summary of this case from State v. Amburgy

Opinion

2001.


Summaries of

Reconsideration Docket

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 2001
755 N.E.2d 356 (Ohio 2001)

finding that the trial court's failure to offer any exposition of post-release control sanctions was not adequate and did not constitute substantial compliance with the trial court's responsibility

Summary of this case from State v. Amburgy
Case details for

Reconsideration Docket

Case Details

Full title:RECONSIDERATION DOCKET

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 1, 2001

Citations

755 N.E.2d 356 (Ohio 2001)
93 Ohio St. 3d 1434

Citing Cases

YOH v. SCHLACHTER

Appellee then appealed the case to the Ohio Supreme Court. Our decision was reversed and remanded without…

State v. Szakacs

"Postrelease control constitutes a portion of the maximum penalty involved in an offense for which a prison…