From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RECALL MEREDITH HAINES v. CITY OF GALT

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 13, 2009
Case No. 2:08-CV-02714-WBS-JFM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-CV-02714-WBS-JFM.

February 13, 2009

Charles H. Bell, Jr. (SBN 060553), Thomas W. Hiltachk (SBN 131215), Brian T. Hildreth (SBN 214131), BELL, McANDREWS HILTACHK, LLP, Sacramento, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff, CITIZENS FOR YES ON THE RECALL: RECALL MEREDITH AND HAINES.


ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE


Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, at the request of the plaintiff, this matter is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Each party will bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

RECALL MEREDITH HAINES v. CITY OF GALT

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 13, 2009
Case No. 2:08-CV-02714-WBS-JFM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2009)
Case details for

RECALL MEREDITH HAINES v. CITY OF GALT

Case Details

Full title:CITIZENS FOR YES ON THE RECALL: RECALL MEREDITH AND HAINES, an…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 13, 2009

Citations

Case No. 2:08-CV-02714-WBS-JFM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2009)

Citing Cases

Greenwich Bk. v. Commercial Bk. Corp.

Nor does it matter that the negligence of the plaintiff contributed to the double payment. "Negligence in…

GAF Corp. v. Amchem Products, Inc.

A close reading of McKibben, however, discloses that the court also held that a party under inquiry notice…