From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rebardi v. Central Boat Rentals, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lafayette-Opelousas Division
Oct 11, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-1776 (W.D. La. Oct. 11, 2007)

Summary

In Rebardi v. Central Boat Rentals, Inc., 2007 WL 2993867 [W.D. La.2007], for example, the defendant sought spoliation sanctions.

Summary of this case from Mangione v. Jacobs

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-1776.

October 11, 2007


ORDER


Before the Court is plaintiff's Motion to Strike [Rec. Doc. 102]. Plaintiff moves the Court to strike defendant's Objections to Report and Recommendations [Rec. Doc. 101] as untimely. Magistrate Judge Hill's Report and Recommendations [Rec. Doc. 99] were signed on September 18, 2007 and filed into the record on September 19, 2007.

Title 28, Section 636(b)(1) of the United States Code provides that "[w]ithin ten days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that "[w]hen the period of time prescribed or allowed is less than 11 days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays shall be excluded in the computation [of time]." F.R.C.P. 6(a). Rule 6 further provides that "[w]henever a party must or may act within a prescribed period after service and service is made under Rule 5(b)(2)(B), (C), or (D), 3 days are added after the prescribed period would otherwise expire." F.R.C.P. 6(e). Rule 5(b)(2)(D) provides for service made by electronic means. F.R.C.P. 5(b)(2)(D).

The Report and Recommendations that issued were signed by the Magistrate Judge on September 18, 2007 and filed on September 19, 2007. The applicable date to begin the calculation is September 19, 2007. Because the "day of the act, event or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included" in the computation, the time period would began to toll on September 20, 2007. The 10 day statutory period, excluding weekends and holidays, thus lapsed on October 3, 2007. However, under Rule 6, the parties were given an additional 3 days to allow for service. "Intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays are included in counting these added three days. If the third day is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the last day to act is the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday." Comments to FRCP 6.

Even a cursory review by Mover of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure should have put Mover on notice that a motion such as the one he filed has no basis in fact or in law. It is,

ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion to Strike [Rec. Doc. 102] is DENIED.

Mover requested that in the event that the Court denied his motion that he be granted ten (10) days from the date of the Court's denial to file a response to defendant's objections to the Report and Recommendations [Rec. Doc. 101]. Although there is no statutory or jurisprudential basis to grant Mover the relief he seeks, the Court will nonetheless grant the plaintiff until Monday, October 15, 2007, at 12 Noon Central Standard Time, to file a response to defendant's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report Recommendations. In the event Mover fails to timely comply with this order, any late filed response will not be considered. THUS DONE AND SIGNED.


Summaries of

Rebardi v. Central Boat Rentals, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lafayette-Opelousas Division
Oct 11, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-1776 (W.D. La. Oct. 11, 2007)

In Rebardi v. Central Boat Rentals, Inc., 2007 WL 2993867 [W.D. La.2007], for example, the defendant sought spoliation sanctions.

Summary of this case from Mangione v. Jacobs
Case details for

Rebardi v. Central Boat Rentals, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE REBARDI, III. v. CENTRAL BOAT RENTALS, INC

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lafayette-Opelousas Division

Date published: Oct 11, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-1776 (W.D. La. Oct. 11, 2007)

Citing Cases

Mangione v. Jacobs

Other courts, however, have rejected the proposition that a plaintiff's surgery, without permitting an…