From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reardon v. Segal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Mar 18, 2016
CIVIL NO. 15-244(NLH/JS) (D.N.J. Mar. 18, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 15-244(NLH/JS)

03-18-2016

JOHN E. REARDON, Plaintiff, v. VINCENT SEGAL, et al., Defendants.

Appearances: JOHN E. REARDON 1 JOANS LANE BERLIN, NJ 08009 Pro Se Plaintiff BRIAN P. WILSON STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DIVISION OF LAW 25 MARKET STREET P.O. BOX 116 TRENTON, NJ 08625 Attorney for Defendants


MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

Appearances: JOHN E. REARDON
1 JOANS LANE
BERLIN, NJ 08009

Pro Se Plaintiff BRIAN P. WILSON
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
DIVISION OF LAW
25 MARKET STREET
P.O. BOX 116
TRENTON, NJ 08625

Attorney for Defendants HILLMAN , District Judge

This matter having come before the Court on plaintiff's motion for default judgment [27]; and

Plaintiff requesting the entry of default judgment against unspecified defendants on all his claims; but

The Court noting that under Federal Civil Procedure Rule 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two-step process: first, when a defendant has failed to plead or otherwise respond, a plaintiff must request the entry of default by the Clerk of the Court, Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), and second, after the Clerk has entered the party's default, a plaintiff may then obtain a judgment by default by either (1) asking the Clerk to enter judgment, if the judgment is a sum certain, or (2) applying to the Court, Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b); Sourcecorp Inc. v. Croney, 412 F. App'x 455, 458 (3d Cir. 2011); but

The Court also notes that if plaintiff obtains a Clerk's entry of default against defendants, and then refiles his current motion for default judgment, he must do more than demonstrate that defendants have failed to appear in the action. See Franklin v. National Maritime Union of America, (MEBA/NMU), Civ. No. 91-480, 1991 WL 131182, *1 (D.N.J. July 16, 1991) (quoting 10 Wright, Miller & Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2685 (1983)) (explaining that when considering an application for entry of a default judgment under Rule 55(b)(2), the Court is "required to exercise 'sound judicial discretion' in deciding whether the judgment should be entered [and] '[t]his element of discretion makes it clear that the party making the request is not entitled to a default judgment as of right, even when defendant is technically in default and that fact has been noted under Rule 55(a)'"); Comdyne I. Inc. v. Corbin, 908 F.2d 1142, 1149 (3d Cir. 1990) (explaining that even though by virtue of defendant's default, every "well-plead allegation" of the complaint, except those relating to damages, are deemed admitted, a plaintiff must articulate the substantive legal basis for a finding in its favor). --------

The Court finding that plaintiff has by-passed the first step of the process;

Therefore,

IT IS on this 18th day of March, 2016

ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for the entry of default judgment [27] be, the same hereby is, DENIED.

s/ Noel L. Hillman

NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J. At Camden, New Jersey


Summaries of

Reardon v. Segal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Mar 18, 2016
CIVIL NO. 15-244(NLH/JS) (D.N.J. Mar. 18, 2016)
Case details for

Reardon v. Segal

Case Details

Full title:JOHN E. REARDON, Plaintiff, v. VINCENT SEGAL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Mar 18, 2016

Citations

CIVIL NO. 15-244(NLH/JS) (D.N.J. Mar. 18, 2016)