From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reape v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 2009
68 A.D.3d 1086 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2009-00337.

December 22, 2009.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kurtz, J.), dated November 14, 2008, Which granted the defendant's motion to permanently enjoin him from enforcing a judgment of the same court (Clemente, J.), entered February 17, 1995, upon a jury verdict, and a judgment of the same court (S. Leone, J.), entered February 16, 1999, upon a jury verdict, on the ground that the judgments were unenforceable as having been reversed on appeal.

Harold Reape, Brooklyn, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Barry P. Schwartz and Julie Steiner of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Belen, Hall and Austin, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion to permanently enjoin the plaintiff from enforcing judgments entered in his favor on February 17, 1995 and February 16, 1999, respectively, which were reversed by this Court's decisions and orders in Reape v City of New York ( 228 AD2d 659) and Reape v City of New York ( 272 AD2d 533).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court on this appeal.


Summaries of

Reape v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 2009
68 A.D.3d 1086 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Reape v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD REAPE, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 22, 2009

Citations

68 A.D.3d 1086 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 9639
890 N.Y.S.2d 334

Citing Cases

State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v. Anikeyeva

It is well established that the determination to grant a preliminary injunction lies within the sound…