From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reading Company v. Pope Talbot, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Oct 25, 1961
295 F.2d 40 (3d Cir. 1961)

Opinion

No. 13603.

Argued October 17, 1961.

Decided October 25, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; C. William Kraft, Jr., Judge.

Harrison G. Kildare, Philadelphia, Pa. (Rawle Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., Thomas F. Mount, J. Welles Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Elmer C. Maddy, New York City (Krusen, Evans Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., and Kirlin, Campbell Keating, Roy C. Megargel, New York City, Claus G.U. Claesson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee Pope Talbot, Inc.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and GANEY, Circuit Judges.


Upon review of the record we find no error.

The Interlocutory Decree of the District Court of March 30, 1961, 192 F. Supp. 663, will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Reading Company v. Pope Talbot, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Oct 25, 1961
295 F.2d 40 (3d Cir. 1961)
Case details for

Reading Company v. Pope Talbot, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:READING COMPANY, Appellant v. POPE TALBOT, INC. and Merritt-Chapman Scott…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Oct 25, 1961

Citations

295 F.2d 40 (3d Cir. 1961)

Citing Cases

Morania Barge No. 140, Inc. v. M. J. Tracy

If the statute were interpreted literally, it would be undeniable that Tracy was in violation of its…

United States v. Raven

The purpose of this statute is the protection of other vessels plying the same waters. Consequently it is…