From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Re Exhaustion of State Remedies in Criminal Cases

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jul 11, 1990
321 S.C. 563 (S.C. 1990)

Summary

finding in all appeals from criminal convictions or post-conviction relief matters, "when the claim has been presented to the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court, and relief has been denied, the litigant shall be deemed to have exhausted all avaliable state remedies."

Summary of this case from Rose v. Warden, McCormick Corr. Inst.

Opinion

July 11, 1990


ORDER

In 1979, the General Assembly created the South Carolina Court of Appeals for the purpose of reducing South Carolina's appellate backlog. The Court of Appeals reviews criminal as well as civil appeals and this Court reviews its decisions by writ of certiorari only where special reasons justify the exercise of that power.

We recognize that criminal and postconviction relief litigants have routinely petitioned this Court for writ of certiorari upon the Court of Appeals' denial of relief in order to exhaust all available state remedies. We therefore declare that in all appeals from criminal convictions or postconviction relief matters, a litigant shall not be required to petition for rehearing and certiorari following an adverse decision of the Court of Appeals in order to be deemed to have exhausted all available state remedies respecting a claim of error. Rather, when the claim has been presented to the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court, and relief has been denied, the litigant shall be deemed to have exhausted all available state remedies. This order shall become effective immediately.

See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(b)-2254(c) (1977).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ George T. Gregory, Jr. C.J. /s/ David W. Harwell A.J. /s/ A. Lee Chandler A.J. /s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr. A.J. /s/ Jean H. Toal A.J.


Summaries of

Re Exhaustion of State Remedies in Criminal Cases

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jul 11, 1990
321 S.C. 563 (S.C. 1990)

finding in all appeals from criminal convictions or post-conviction relief matters, "when the claim has been presented to the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court, and relief has been denied, the litigant shall be deemed to have exhausted all avaliable state remedies."

Summary of this case from Rose v. Warden, McCormick Corr. Inst.
Case details for

Re Exhaustion of State Remedies in Criminal Cases

Case Details

Full title:Re Exhaustion of State Remedies In Criminal and Postconviction Relief Cases

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jul 11, 1990

Citations

321 S.C. 563 (S.C. 1990)
471 S.E.2d 454

Citing Cases

O'Sullivan v. Boerckel

See, e.g., In re Exhaustion of State Remedies in Criminal and Post-Conviction Relief Cases, 321 S.C. 563, 471…

In re Abdur'rahman

See, e.g., In re Exhaustion of State Remedies in Criminal and Post-Conviction Relief Cases, 321 S.C. 563, 471…