From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Apr 19, 1926
13 F.2d 126 (8th Cir. 1926)

Opinion

No. 7064.

April 19, 1926.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma; John H. Cotteral, Judge.

Criminal prosecution by the United States against Bass Ray. Judgment of conviction, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

J.Q.A. Harrod, of Oklahoma City, Okla., for plaintiff in error.

Roy St. Lewis, U.S. Atty., of Oklahoma City, and Leslie E. Salter, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Tulsa, Okla.

Before SANBORN, Circuit Judge and MUNGER and JOHNSON, District Judges.


The defendant below was indicted, tried, and convicted, and sentenced for the unlawful purchase, not in or from an original stamped package, of nine grains of morphine. Counsel for the defendant in his brief concedes that the record of the trial in this case is "void of any exceptions, motions to direct a verdict, or objections to the instructions," and adds: "We are forced to rely upon that inherent right that this court has to review a verdict and record, where liberty and life is involved, to prevent a miscarriage of justice, and we most earnestly ask the court to review this record, for the purpose of determining whether or not there has been such miscarriage of justice."

This appellate court ought not, therefore, in view of the numerous cases waiting on lawful requests for reviews of the evidence therein, to delay the decisions in those cases to decide the sufficiency of the evidence in this case, unless it is satisfied that there has been a miscarriage of justice here. Feinberg v. United States (C.C.A.) 2 F.2d 955, 956; Damico v. Firemen's Fund Ins. Co. (C.C.A.) 5 F.2d 318, 319. At counsel's request we have thoughtfully read the evidence, the instructions of the court, and the briefs of counsel for the parties in this suit, to ascertain whether or not there was a miscarriage of justice here, and we are not convinced that there was.

The judgment below is therefore affirmed.


Summaries of

Ray v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Apr 19, 1926
13 F.2d 126 (8th Cir. 1926)
Case details for

Ray v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RAY v. UNITED STATES

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Apr 19, 1926

Citations

13 F.2d 126 (8th Cir. 1926)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. United States

The general rule is that a federal appellate court will not pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence to…