From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. Texaco, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 18, 1973
488 F.2d 1087 (5th Cir. 1973)

Opinion

No. 73-2962. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5 Cir. see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409.

December 18, 1973.

Fred E. Salley, Frank C. Allen, Jr., New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.

James E. Blazek, Joel L. Borrello, New Orleans, La., for Noble Drilling Corp.

Joel T. Chaisson, Luling, La., for Gerald W. Ray.

Stephen J. Hornyak, Dominick Savona, Jr., Gretna, La., for Pan Mar Services.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Before BELL, GODBOLD and GEE, Circuit Judges.



The entry of judgment in the within matter adjudicated the liabilities of fewer than all of the parties in and to the litigation. There has been no entry of final judgment by the district court upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay as is required by Rule 54(b), F.R.Civ. Procedure. Hence, the judgment lacks the requisite finality to be appealable within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291. International Harvester Credit Corporation v. Belding, 5 Cir., 1972, 462 F.2d 624; Bailey v. Rowan Drilling Company, 5 Cir., 1971, 441 F.2d 57; Cook v. Eizenman, 5 Cir., 1963, 312 F.2d 134.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Ray v. Texaco, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 18, 1973
488 F.2d 1087 (5th Cir. 1973)
Case details for

Ray v. Texaco, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GERALD RAY, PLAINTIFF, v. TEXACO, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Dec 18, 1973

Citations

488 F.2d 1087 (5th Cir. 1973)

Citing Cases

United States v. City of Miami

Initially, it is clear that, as the decree does not affect the FOP, the district court has not entered a…