From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. Schoo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 2, 2014
CASE NO. CV 10-942-VAP(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 10-942-VAP(PJW)

01-02-2014

EDWARD V. RAY, JR., Plaintiff, v. G. SCHOO, et al., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the records on file, and the Final Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the original Report to which Defendants have objected. The Court accepts the Final Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions.

DATED: January 2 2014

/s/_________

VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ray v. Schoo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 2, 2014
CASE NO. CV 10-942-VAP(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Ray v. Schoo

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD V. RAY, JR., Plaintiff, v. G. SCHOO, et al., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 2, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. CV 10-942-VAP(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2014)

Citing Cases

Reece v. Sisto

See Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 7 (1992); Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096. Johnson, 217 F.3d at 731; Dixon v.…

Elhady v. Bradley

Bradley would disagree that there is no case directly on point. He cites Ray v. Schoo, No. cv-10-942, 2014 WL…