Summary
concluding that discretionary appeal was required in case where superior court reviewed and approved auditor's report, but also issued a permanent injunction
Summary of this case from Patel v. EppsOpinion
37447.
DECIDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1981. REHEARING DENIED OCTOBER 14, 1981.
Injunction, etc. Hall Superior Court. Before Judge Scoggin, Senior Judge.
Cook, Noell, Tolley Aldridge, David E. Ralston, for appellant.
Telford, Stewart Stephens, W. Woodrow Stewart, Ann A. Shuler, for appellee.
In a previous appearance of this case, this court reversed the grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee Stephens. Ravan v. Stephens, 243 Ga. 289 ( 253 S.E.2d 753) (1979). We noted that "[t]his is a case that should be settled, for, in truth, the issues are not simple, and, from a careful examination of the record, the parties are not far apart in their positions." Id. at 290.
The case, however, was not settled. It was submitted to an auditor, who made findings of fact and conclusions of law. In accordance with the auditor's report, the trial court issued a permanent injunction "restraining Willard Ravan, his agents, servants, employees, transferees, lessees, or grantees from entering upon, or going upon in any manner the road or property of Plaintiff." Ravan filed a notice of appeal.
In C. S. Nat. Bank v. Rayle, 246 Ga. 727, 731 ( 273 S.E.2d 139) (1980), this court held "that where an auditor is appointed in an equity case and renders a report which contains findings of fact and conclusions of law which are approved by the trial court, a judgment rendered on such report ... is subject to the application requirement of § 6-701.1 ..." As no application has been filed in the instant case, the appeal must be dismissed. Brown v. Brown, 245 Ga. 44 ( 263 S.E.2d 438) (1980).
Appeal dismissed. Jordan, C. J., Hill, P. J., Marshall, Clarke and Gregory, JJ., concur.