From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rattler v. Rattler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 20, 1999
264 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued June 11, 1999

September 20, 1999

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McNulty, J.), entered May 18, 1998, which, inter alia, awarded the plaintiff wife custody of the parties' two infant children, maintenance, and child support, and (2) an order of the same court, dated October 22, 1998, which, inter alia, awarded the plaintiff arrears in maintenance and child support in the sum of $6,072 pursuant to the judgment.

Corner, Finn, Nicholson Charles, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Michael Nicholson and Diana L. Nicholson of counsel), for appellant.

Diamond Keenan, (Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein, Wolf Schlissel, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. [Stephen W. Schlissel; Thelma L. Weil on the brief] of counsel), for respondent.

SONDRA MILLER, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment and order are affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The court's determination that it was in the best interests of the children to award custody to the plaintiff has a sound and substantial basis in the record ( see, Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 171; Friederwitzer v. Friederwitzer, 55 N.Y.2d 89, 95; Young v. Young, 212 A.D.2d 114, 117).

In addition, the court's determination to award the plaintiff child support and maintenance arrears commencing from the date that she first demanded the relief in her original complaint was proper ( see, Reutenauer v. Reutenauer, 229 A.D.2d 776; see also, King v. King, 230 A.D.2d 775; Forbush v. Forbush, 115 A.D.2d 335; Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B][6][a]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

S. MILLER, J.P., O'BRIEN, FRIEDMANN, and FLORIO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rattler v. Rattler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 20, 1999
264 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Rattler v. Rattler

Case Details

Full title:JACQUELINE RATTLER, Respondent, v. STEVEN RATTLER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 20, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
695 N.Y.S.2d 123

Citing Cases

Poli v. Poli

Upon evaluation of all of the relevant statutory factors, including the needs of the children, we find that a…

In Matter of Kinch v. Neckles [2d Dept 2001

Its determination to apply the statutory percentage of 17% for one child, as mandated by the Child Support…