From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raposo v. Raposo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 12, 1998
250 A.D.2d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 12, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.).


Defendants-appellant's sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to them upon the ground that defendant Sanchez, the driver of defendant Di-Rich's vehicle, had been confronted with an emergency situation when the car in which plaintiffs were riding suddenly crossed from the westbound lane of traffic into the eastbound lane in the immediate path of the Di-Rich vehicle. As the motion court found, however, the deposition testimony of plaintiffs and defendant-respondent Ramon Raposo to the effect that there had been an interval of several seconds between the cross-over and the collision raises a triable issue as to whether Sanchez was in fact confronted by an emergency situation and, concomitantly, as to whether Sanchez had a reasonable opportunity under the circumstances to avoid the collision ( compare, Caban v. Vega, 226 A.D.2d 109, 111). Given the existence of these factual issues, it cannot be said as a matter of law that defendants-appellants were not in some measure responsible for the subject accident and therefore, summary judgment was properly denied.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Wallach, Rubin, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Raposo v. Raposo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 12, 1998
250 A.D.2d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Raposo v. Raposo

Case Details

Full title:SANDY RAPOSO, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, BENITA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 12, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 92

Citing Cases

Trevino v. Castro

Defendants owner and driver of the car in which plaintiff was a passenger argue that the depositions show…

Tossas v. Ponce

Before: Tom, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ., concur. The parties' conflicting deposition testimony…